Response to Megan's Comments
- The most helpful
piece of advice I received was when you would ask “like what” or “how does
that affect the strength and weaknesses for the source. When you asked me
these questions it allowed for me to push on my thinking and get even more
specific. I found that the more specific I became, the stronger the sources
seemed and my paper seemed to flow better.
- All of the advice
I received was beneficial but I feel that the least beneficial where the highlighted
grammatical errors. I would have been able to see them had I spent the
time and reread the paper.
- One question that the
comments left me with is what does it really mean to see the sources
strengths and weaknesses? I need to be able to explain whether or not some
things help the source’s credibility or if the piece of information
hinders its ability to be considered creditable.
- For revision I plan
on answering all of your questions that were asked. I will give the specific
details so that the it makes it easier for me to go back and reference the
source.
Yes, tell me how and why it is credible (or not). You can also talk about the article's readability - organization, vocabulary, depth of explanation.
ReplyDelete