Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Response to Megan's Comments



  1. The most helpful piece of advice I received was when you would ask “like what” or “how does that affect the strength and weaknesses for the source. When you asked me these questions it allowed for me to push on my thinking and get even more specific. I found that the more specific I became, the stronger the sources seemed and my paper seemed to flow better.

  1. All of the advice I received was beneficial but I feel that the least beneficial where the highlighted grammatical errors. I would have been able to see them had I spent the time and reread the paper.

  1. One question that the comments left me with is what does it really mean to see the sources strengths and weaknesses? I need to be able to explain whether or not some things help the source’s credibility or if the piece of information hinders its ability to be considered creditable.

  1. For revision I plan on answering all of your questions that were asked. I will give the specific details so that the it makes it easier for me to go back and reference the source. 

1 comment:

  1. Yes, tell me how and why it is credible (or not). You can also talk about the article's readability - organization, vocabulary, depth of explanation.

    ReplyDelete